[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-132: ISP Sub-assignments Do Not Require Specific Customer Relationships

Jack Bates jbates at brightok.net
Fri Feb 11 20:32:14 EST 2011

On 2/11/2011 7:23 PM, John Curran wrote:
> That would mean all of these assignments would also be (per need-based
> (requiring 80% utilization for assignments to end-user customers and following
> the ARIN to ISP utilization requirements for customer ISP allocations)

I believe that's exactly what he meant. I do wonder, though, if this 
proposal isn't perhaps redundant with prop-121's LIR/ISP interchangeable 
definitions? Does it actually add clarity with prop-121 as well as 
current NRPM?


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list