[arin-ppml] LRSA requirement for resources being transferred (Was: ARIN-prop-136 Services Opt-out Allowed for Unaffiliated Address Blocks

[John Curran]

On Feb 26, 2011, at 3:57 AM, Benson Schliesser wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2011, at 12:12 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> Once ARIN becomes aware that the resources are no longer being utilized by the
>> resource holder of record, they can be considered abandoned and made available
>> for registration to an RSA-contracted recipient. Beyond that, there is no real need
>> for enforcement, per se.
> 
> And that *is* enforcement of ARIN policy.  In the example, number resources are being used in a manner agreed upon by both the original resource holder and the new resource holder.

We have no problem changing the registration records in the 
ARIN Whois in accordance with the community-developed policy.
To the extent a resource holder is using the resources (even
if underutilized), it has been our practice not to make policy
that would hinder their use of the resources.  This is not the
case when a party has stopped using the number resources, and 
then attempts to attempts to fraudulently transfer them.

/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN