[arin-ppml] LRSA requirement for resources being transferred (Was: ARIN-prop-136 Services Opt-out Allowed for Unaffiliated Address Blocks

William Herrin bill at herrin.us
Fri Feb 25 00:59:38 EST 2011


On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew at matthew.at> wrote:
> So the issue is that if ARIN believes that legacy non-LRSA resources are not
> transferable and yet the transferer and the transferee believe they are, we
> have a problem.
>
> There's two courses of actions for the transfering parties to take in this
> case: not tell ARIN (which is bad for the database quality), or sue ARIN
> (which is bad for ARIN in other ways).

Don't tell ARIN = okay, but your records look fishy, are fishy, and
are viewed with suspicion by your vendors. And they're always the old
registrant plus a chain of messy looking signed letters leading to
you.

Sue = Kremen. IIRC, the legal precedent was set. No transfer of legacy
addresses without them coming under RSA.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list