[arin-ppml] LRSA requirement for resources being transferred (Was: ARIN-prop-136 Services Opt-out Allowed for Unaffiliated Address Blocks

Matthew Kaufman matthew at matthew.at
Fri Feb 25 00:10:57 EST 2011

On 2/24/2011 5:22 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> On Feb 24, 2011, at 5:13 PM, Scott Leibrand wrote:
>> I'm not sure it should even be necessary for a seller to have an LRSA to release resources under NRPM 8.3: there's nothing in the text of 8.3 that says they need to sign one: it just says " IPv4 number resources within the ARIN region may be released to ARIN by the authorized resource holder...
> That is correct.  The 8.3 transfer policy specifically places no burden on the seller.  The seller need not be an RSA or LRSA signatory, and presumably in most cases will not be.

Yes, this appears to be correct, even though a cursory reading of the 
transfer section suggests otherwise (one needs to remember what 
"received" means in order to parse it correctly)

However, it *is* the case that one must have signed the LRSA to list 
legacy resources in the STLS. Why is that?

Matthew Kaufman

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list