[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-132: ISP Sub-assignments Do Not Require Specific Customer Relationships

George Bonser gbonser at seven.com
Fri Feb 11 17:32:19 EST 2011

> I'm not opposed, but I am confused. Don't we want to prevent and/or
> retard de-aggregation?  Are the consequences of de-aggregation of less
> magnitude than the consequences of
> failing to detach the notion of the LIR from the notion of the ISP?

Too late for that at this point.  V4 is going to shatter into a million
tiny pieces now. Where it will make a difference is in v6.  Many don't
take smaller than a /32 out of PA space but that will change as the
pressure from v4 eases up and they aren't trying to run dual-stack.  The
only thing really pressuring not taking more specific than a /32 out of
PA in v6 is v4 bloat and its impact on dual-stack routers.  

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list