[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-132: ISP Sub-assignments Do Not Require Specific Customer Relationships
George Bonser
gbonser at seven.com
Fri Feb 11 13:47:34 EST 2011
Support.
If you consider an LIR as just that, a local internet registry. They
are given a block of IP addresses to reassign. As long as the
reassignee qualifies for IP addresses and meets the usage requirements,
I don't see any issue. The usage of those IPs (or lack thereof) would
still count against the LIR in its justification for any additional
assignments of IP addresses.
I think the notion that someone had to have physical connectivity to the
LIR in order to get IPs is a conclusion to which many have jumped simply
because that is the usual case, but not necessarily the rule. An LIR
could be a consultant to a "customer", could be a professional services
vendor, etc. An LIR getting a customer set up with IP addresses even if
that customer uses a different connectivity provider shouldn't be a
problem.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net]
On
> Behalf Of ARIN
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 8:28 AM
> To: arin-ppml at arin.net
> Subject: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-132: ISP Sub-assignments Do Not Require
> Specific Customer Relationships
>
> ARIN received the following policy proposal and is posting it to the
> Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) in accordance with the Policy
> Development Process.
>
> The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) will review the proposal at their next
> regularly scheduled meeting (if the period before the next regularly
> scheduled meeting is less than 10 days, then the period may be
extended
> to the subsequent regularly scheduled meeting). The AC will decide how
> to utilize the proposal and announce the decision to the PPML.
>
> The AC invites everyone to comment on the proposal on the PPML,
> particularly their support or non-support and the reasoning
> behind their opinion. Such participation contributes to a thorough
> vetting and provides important guidance to the AC in their
> deliberations.
>
> Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html
>
> The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html
>
> Mailing list subscription information can be found
> at: https://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/
>
> Regards,
>
> Communications and Member Services
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
>
>
> ## * ##
>
>
> ARIN-prop-132: ISP Sub-assignments Do Not Require Specific Customer
> Relationships
>
> Proposal Originator: Benson Schliesser
>
> Proposal Version: 1
>
> Date: 11 February 2011
>
> Proposal type: modify
>
> Policy term: permanent
>
> Policy statement:
>
> Section 4.2.1.1 of the NRPM shall be modified to read:
>
> "ARIN allocates blocks of IP addresses to ISPs for the purpose of
> reassigning that space to their customers. ARIN does not limit
> reassignment by ISPs to their customers based on any criteria except
> those that are explicitly described in the NRPM. An ISP is solely
> responsible for determining whether an organization is a customer for
> the purposes of reassignment under this policy."
>
> Rationale:
>
> This policy proposal is intended to permit an ISP to enter into
> reassignment relationships with anybody they deem to be a customer.
> Under this proposal, ARIN will not object to reassignment
relationships
> because of their business nature. This specifically permits the
> reassignment of IPv4 addresses in "lease" relationships between an ISP
> and its customers, amongst others.
>
> Timetable for implementation: immediately
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list