[arin-ppml] inevitability of NAT?
marka at isc.org
Thu Feb 10 18:23:44 EST 2011
In message <8C3975B8-3102-48FA-A555-18AE6E428027 at delong.com>, Owen DeLong writes
> Why would anyone bother porting application code to PCP instead of just adding
> IPv6 capabilities? It seems to me that adding IPv6 is usually much simpler th
> an adding PCP support and yields a much longer lifetime.
You want PCP to control the firewall so you want to add both IPv6 and PCP.
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
More information about the ARIN-PPML