[arin-ppml] Application requests for IPv6?

[Owen DeLong]

On Feb 9, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 7:03 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> Note that the first one and third one do not require your IPv4 space to be covered by RSA or
>>> LRSA.
>> 
>> Correct.  Only any IPv6 space received would be covered by an RSA.
>> /John
>> 
> 
> Let me see if I can clarify a bit.
> 
> I'm not talking about qualifying. I'm talking about legacy holders not
> signed to any agreement receiving IPv6 resources without agreeing to
> put their legacy resources under agreement with ARIN in order to
> receive an IPv6 allocation.
> 
Right.. That's what we were talking about too.

>> From the ARIN website:
> 
> https://www.arin.net/resources/agreements/index.html
> 
> "ARIN must receive a signed Registration Services Agreement from
> organizations and individuals whose resource requests have been
> approved before any allocation or assignment can be made."
> 
Right... The IPv6 resources have to be covered under an RSA. This does
not require them to put their IPv4 resources under LRSA or RSA.

> Seems to me if a legacy holder without a signed RSA or LRSA applies to
> ARIN for v6 addresses and is "qualified" and able to "justify" an IPv6
> assignment, they will be required to sign an agreement with ARIN to
> receive the allocation. Question is, will that agreement consider
> their legacy resources to be included as part of the agreement?
> 
No... The agreement would only cover the IPv6 resources unless
they expressed a desire otherwise.

Owen