[arin-ppml] Borders sells their /16 block
hannigan at gmail.com
Wed Dec 7 16:10:25 EST 2011
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 3:01 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2011, at 3:14 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>> Why don't we just go back to the court documents and reference where
>> each have said 'while we don't necessarily need to deal with ARIN'
> In Nortel, the actual court document was approved only with affirmation
> that the recipient had entered into a registration services agreement
> with ARIN. See prior posting to Mike for the specific references.
I encourage you to provide a cite to a specific line in the document
that affirms your statement. We can agree to disagree for now.
> In Kremen, the Court cited as fact in its Order ARIN's representations:
[ clip ]
In Kremens, I was also talking about where ARIN disclaimed authority
over legacy addresses. YMMV.
More information about the ARIN-PPML