[arin-ppml] ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 70, Issue 141
mike at nationwideinc.com
Fri Apr 29 11:49:06 EDT 2011
I leave it to the community to decide whether a needs requirement policy which:
1 can be manipulated in a way that is "not very difficult"
2.has the effect of disincentivizing LRSAs
3 contributes to the lack of valid whois data
4.artificially restricts supply of address space
5.puts us out of coformance with the region closest to terminal exhaust (APNIC)
6 puts us out of coformance with established law regarding legacy transfers which do not require need
is a policy worth maintaining.
----- Original Message -----
From: John Curran
To: Mike Burns ; Mike Burns
Cc: Rudolph Daniel ; arin-ppml at arin.net List
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 70, Issue 141
On Apr 29, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Mike Burns wrote:
I remain unconvinced, and I note that you wish us to continue to believe that the arbitrary assortment of addresses which Microsoft contracted to buy from Nortel prior to ARIN's involvement in the deal turned out to be the exact amount required in the ex post facto needs analysis of the deal.
As is your right.
ARIN has more than a decade of experience doing documented needs assessments,
and (as it has been pointed out by others on the PPML list), it is not very difficult for an
existing network operation to show the past growth and future plans to warrant allocation
(or transfer) for additional address space. We often come up with a different view than
organizations applying for resources, and this does result in a request being denied or
going through for a smaller allocation than expected. As long as the policies require that
we have documented needs assessment, we will continue to perform them.
President and CEO
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML