[arin-ppml] Microsoft receives court approval for transfer as agreed with ARIN
Keith W. Hare
Keith at jcc.com
Thu Apr 28 15:17:19 EDT 2011
>From my point of view as a legacy holder, the positive business incentive subjecting ourselves to ARIN policy is an orderly internet.
My company gets a much larger benefit out of having the internet work in a resonably orderly fashion than we could ever hope to get out of selling off our IP address assignment.
JCC Consulting, Inc.
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of William Herrin
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 1:54 PM
To: David Conrad
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Microsoft receives court approval for transfer as agreed with ARIN
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:51 PM, David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org> wrote:
> On Apr 28, 2011, at 6:51 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> how do you suggest we go about getting legacy address registrants who
>> have not already done so to express an opinion?
> From a legacy holder's perspective, what positive business incentive is there in subjecting oneself to ARIN policy?
Security. Like putting your money in a bank. But that notion doesn't work if the deposit agreement insists that you don't own your deposit...
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML