[arin-ppml] Staff proposing policy.
jcurran at arin.net
Thu Apr 28 14:47:12 EDT 2011
On Apr 28, 2011, at 2:35 PM, Scott Leibrand wrote:
> On Apr 28, 2011, at 11:10 AM, Leo Bicknell <bicknell at ufp.org> wrote:
>> Let me offer a middle ground. If we don't want staff making a
>> policy proposal directly, could we at least get staff directly
>> involved in having conversations about policy on PPML? Do we really
>> have to wait for a twice a year report to learn from their experiences?
To be clear, is this a suggest for staff to provide more realtime input
with respect solely to implementation issues with existing and proposed
policies, or also with respect to policy intention and goals?
e.g. "If 20xx-n had its second sentence reworded to match the existing
critical infrastructure definition, that would the clearer"
or also "If 20xx-n included World of Warcraft servers in the definition of
critical infrastructure, that might better serve the community..
(and certainly would make some of us happy)"
Just trying to understand the intent here...
President and CEO
More information about the ARIN-PPML