[arin-ppml] ARIN-2011-5: Shared Transition Space for IPv4 Address Extension - Last Call
lsawyer at gci.com
Wed Apr 20 13:13:51 EDT 2011
Yes, and it was brought up that if the need can be shared across multiple groups, then it is already more
of a "win" than if only one group gets access to it.
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of cja at daydream.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 9:09 AM
To: Martin Hannigan
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2011-5: Shared Transition Space for IPv4 Address Extension - Last Call
I do think that there is a group of folks who need this. Whether or not that need is more or less important than anyone else's need is up to the community to decide. I just wanted to be clear that this was already rejected two times in two different venues.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com<mailto:hannigan at gmail.com>> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:44 AM, cja at daydream.com<mailto:cja at daydream.com> <packetgrrl at gmail.com<mailto:packetgrrl at gmail.com>> wrote:
> I too oppose this proposal. Let's be really clear here. The more
> appropriate venue is/was the IETF and the IETF turned it down. It was also
> brought up in the APNIC region and that region also turned it down.
Do you think that they have need regardless of the non support for the method?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML