[arin-ppml] Proposal 2011-6
bill at herrin.us
Fri Apr 8 01:40:10 EDT 2011
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 14:20, cja at daydream.com <packetgrrl at gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. Proposal Summary (Staff Understanding):
> This policy proposal would require ARIN to retain any address space that
> is or has been returned, revoked or recovered for redistribution to
> customers within the ARIN region, except where otherwise directed by
Thanks Cathy, Chris,
I'm satisfied with and support the proposal as understood by staff but
if I ever hear, "It doesn't say we can't return addresses to IANA,"
you're gonna get a big fat "I told you so."
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Alexander, Daniel
<Daniel_Alexander at cable.comcast.com> wrote:
> It is understandable that people would want IPv4 resources to stay in the
> region when they are scarce. But what happens when the ARIN region starts to
> reach parity with IPv6 services? IPv4 resources will start to lose their
> urgency in this region, but will still be needed in others.
What happens is this: someone complains that they could really use our
no longer needed IPv4 addresses and writes a policy proposal to allow
them to be transferred out-region.
> Does anyone consider this hoarding?
If you buy the last loaf of bread and then _eat it,_ is it hoarding?
> If another region were
> to exhibit similar behavior, this region would be quite vocal in
Other regions do engage in behavior we disapprove of. By and large, we
get over it. The alternative is ICANN runs things and we all lose.
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
More information about the ARIN-PPML