[arin-ppml] Final draft of 2010-13 for Atlanta (Rev 1.55)

[Joe Maimon]

Owen DeLong wrote:
>>
>> I think the community would be much better served by waiting.
>
> Leo,
>
> 	Waiting is fatal if you want to set space aside for transition beyond
> the /10 that is already set aside for a very vague and limited subset
> of transitional technologies. One of the key points of this was the
> realization that with the broad set of transition needs staring us
> in the face, 4.10 was wholly inadequate to the task and it really
> does make much more sense to reserve the entire last /8.
>
> 	That can't wait until the next policy cycle. By then, it will be
> allocated.
>
> Owen
>

I agree with both Leo and Owen. That is what abandoned Policy Proposal 
#112 was all about, choosing to wait before deciding what do with the 
last /8 in minute detail.

http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2010-April/017410.html

Unless a policy will actively cause serious issues, even if all it 
accomplishes is preventing more of the last /8 from running through at 
the same rate as current, I am going to support it.

Joe