[arin-ppml] Opposed to 2010-9 and 2010-12

Christopher Morrow christopher.morrow at gmail.com
Thu Oct 7 16:12:22 EDT 2010

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> Probably a /24. That allows a /56 for end-sites which is suboptimal
> (end sites should be at least a /48), but, hopefully doesn't consume
> too vast a swath of IPv6 in the process (roughly a  /8).

can't we let the ISP decide what makes sense? it seems (to me) that a
/48 for a business-type link (your traditional T1/T3 customer type,
and office, etc.) is perfectly rational. It seems, to me, that a /56
for a consumer (dsl/cable/etc) is also quite fine.

There are, I'm sure, ISP folks who'd decide to just assign a /48
across the board... I'm not sure that guidance (aside from general
scoping) is required from ARIN to the members/users.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list