[arin-ppml] Opposed to 2010-9 and 2010-12

[Christopher Morrow]

On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Joe Maimon <jmaimon at chl.com> wrote:
>
> Is there any reason a large ISP might want more than one 6rd scheme?

a /28 is a rather large item... it should let them TE traffic decently
enough (inbound at least). I wonder though if the ipv4 mapped
addresses could end up with lots of odd internal traffic matrixes...
and thus smaller deployments could conserve intra-isp traffic
requirements?

Or maybe you can force traffic into native-v6 closer to the user edge
and cheat that way?

(overlay/encap technologies ... ick)
-chris