[arin-ppml] IPv6 Transition Policy (aka Soft Landing)

[Hannigan, Martin]

[ clip ]

> 
> I could only be comfortable with something like this were it to be
> accompanied by a much larger framework for reserved pools of addresses,
> address pools which had other qualifiers for eligibility, such as new
> organizations, organizations with no existing or seriously limited
> resources, one-shot open to anybody pool, and similar.

Note, that's what the last proposal had and one of the major themes about
it's failure was the classes and complexities.

> I also would like for such a proposal to encompass more or the entirety
> of the last /8 and to be refilled by returns/revokes if/when they occur.

I think that this might be a half-way decent idea and I believe, but I may
be recalling wrong, that this is the intent.



>From LGA, Best,

-M<