[arin-ppml] early experimenter /32 catch-22
christopher.morrow at gmail.com
Fri Oct 8 11:09:15 EDT 2010
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Jason Schiller <schiller at uu.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> |On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:38 AM, David Williamson <dlw+arin at tellme.com> wrote:
> |> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 04:08:37PM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> |>> (you can't guarantee longer prefixes than a /32 get global
> |>> reachability... so subnetting the current allocation isn't feasible)
> |> Is that really true? Would someone fess up about current routing
> |I know of a case (solved by announcing the /32 aggregate) of this, yes.
> |('hello docs.python.org!')
> |> practice? We definitely accept longer prefixes, as we only have a /45,
> |> and we only advertise /48s. Of course, that's in the PI block.
> |sure, so in the PI ranges it seems most places (save vzb?) accept to
> |/48. In the other allocation sets you can get to /32 but not often
> |very much further (for full reachability).
> AS701 accepts and sends PI and PA /48s to Peers for about 8 months now.
awesome, thanks for accepting my bribe. (note on the list)
> Seems most (not all) folks I talk with accept PI /48s, and slightly better
> than half accpet PA /48s. Renysis says it PA /48 reachability is much
> worse than my experience. (See the NANOG prior to the previous)
yup, it seems at least in some adhoc looking that PA /48's are not
always reachable without a covering route.
More information about the ARIN-PPML