[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 122: Reserved Pool for FuturePolicyDevelopment
gbonser at seven.com
Mon Nov 22 13:16:32 EST 2010
> Or one could simply require a periodic review of the utility being
> served by 4.10 and redirect use of those addresses as befits the
> current 'on the ground' reality.
I like that idea. Don't make the reviews so frequent that they are a
pain but frequent enough where it must be periodically re-evaluated.
The idea is to avoid the "Class E" problem where a block of addresses is
held in reserve in perpetuity and never actually used for anything.
More information about the ARIN-PPML