[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 122: Reserved Pool for Future Policy Development
marty at akamai.com
Thu Nov 18 19:36:34 EST 2010
Agreed, I set an expiration on the proposal of 20 OCT 2011. If no work was
done on it and we didn't reach consensus, it would expire and the addresses
would go back into the free pool.
I also want to note that this would be an emergency request due to the fact
that exhaustion is now. We are _not_ going to make it to the next meeting.
Steve Ryan, ARIN Counsel:
"The date, frankly, is about to hit you in the head, and it's in January.
And in all likelihood that's when the trigger will occur. You know right now
when the date is. And it could come faster, by the way. It could come very
much faster, depending on the drawdown rate. The drawdown rate is
increasing, not slowing. And, therefore, I don't think we should spend any
On 11/19/10 1:20 AM, "Gary Buhrmaster" <gary.buhrmaster at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 23:09, ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:
>> ARIN received the following policy proposal and is posting it to the
>> Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) in accordance with the Policy
>> Development Process.
>> Policy Proposal 122: Reserved Pool for Future Policy Development
> While I can see the appeal of saving the last space "just in case",
> I would only consider supporting a reserved pool if it came with
> a (not too far out) sunset date after which any reserved pool would
> return to (unreserved) normal status if no follow up policy proposal
> could achieve consensus. One should not get unlimited trips
> (and time) to the trough while others have a documented need
> for the resources.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML