[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 122: Reserved Pool for Future Policy Development
owen at delong.com
Thu Nov 18 18:27:47 EST 2010
I oppose this policy. I do not agree that there was consensus that the
existing 4.10 was potentially damaging. There was consensus that
the proposal in question which attempted to carve off a little piece of
pony for all the various stakeholders was not an improvement over
the existing 4.10.
This proposal is far too little far too late.
On Nov 18, 2010, at 3:09 PM, ARIN wrote:
> ARIN received the following policy proposal and is posting it to the
> Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) in accordance with the Policy
> Development Process.
> The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) will review the proposal at their next
> regularly scheduled meeting (if the period before the next regularly
> scheduled meeting is less than 10 days, then the period may be extended
> to the subsequent regularly scheduled meeting). The AC will decide how
> to utilize the proposal and announce the decision to the PPML.
> The AC invites everyone to comment on the proposal on the PPML,
> particularly their support or non-support and the reasoning
> behind their opinion. Such participation contributes to a thorough
> vetting and provides important guidance to the AC in their deliberations.
> Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
> The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at:
> Mailing list subscription information can be found
> at: https://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/
> Communications and Member Services
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
> ## * ##
> Policy Proposal 122: Reserved Pool for Future Policy Development
> Proposal Originator: Martin Hannigan
> Proposal Version: 1.0
> Date: 18 Nov 2010
> Proposal type: Delete, Temporary
> Policy term: October 20, 2011 00:00 UTC
> Policy statement:
> Upon receipt of the last /8 that the IANA will allocate to ARIN per the
> Global Policy for the Allocation of the Remaining IPv4 Address Space,
> ARIN will place a contiguous /10 in a reserved pool for a use to be
> determined at a later date. If adopted, this proposal will delete
> Section 4.10 permanently and then expire per the policy term.
> During the attempted fix of Section 4.10 we had consensus that 4.10 was
> insufficient and potentially damaging and unbalanced with respect to
> transition efforts. This will provide for time to review our current
> depletion strategy and improve upon it to the benefit of the entire
> Timetable for implementation: Immediate
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML