[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2010-10 (Global Proposal): Global Policy for IPv4 Allocations by the IANA Post Exhaustion - Last Call (text revised)
matthew at matthew.at
Thu Nov 4 21:16:08 EDT 2010
On 11/2/2010 10:29 AM, John Curran wrote:
> Correct. They may bring their resources under an RSA or LRSA or not, as they wish. They may also transfer resources under agreement according to the policies adopted in the region, or not transfer them (again as they wish.)
> The only they can't do is transfer resources outside of the policies, as ARIN has to maintain the registration database in accordance with the community policies as adopted.
Only if by "transfer" you narrowly define it to be "change the
registration database through the transfer process to point to the
As has been pointed out, there's lots of other ways to "transfer
resources outside of the policies", including updating the POC records
on legacy resources, leaving the registration database as-is but issuing
Unless you believe that there's a way for ARIN to prohibit legacy
non-RSA, non-LRSA block holders from doing these things.
More information about the ARIN-PPML