[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 122: Reserved Pool for Future Policy Development

[Leo Bicknell]

In a message written on Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:08:38PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Hence my suggestion that 122 would be more palatable if it set aside
> a separate /10 for that purpose rather than raiding 4.10.

I would not object to a second /10, but I'm sure I see it as necessary.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20101124/5bdab670/attachment.sig>