[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 123: Reserved Pool for Critical Infrastructure - revised

[Owen DeLong]

On Nov 21, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Scott Leibrand wrote:

> Is this policy is only really needed if we pass 122? As I read it, CI needs can be met under 4.10. 
> 
No, this policy is needed regardless. It will expand the reserved space regardless of the state of 122.

> I agree this is needed if we pass 122, but wondering if there's reason to pass 123 as a standalone policy (as it seems a lot less controversial). 
> 
If we don't pass 122, this is merely useful and probably necessary. If we do pass 122, this becomes vital and urgent.

Owen

> Thanks,
> Scott
> 
> On Nov 21, 2010, at 11:07 AM, "Hannigan, Martin" <marty at akamai.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 11/20/10 9:18 PM, "William Herrin" <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 3:04 PM, ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:
>>>> Policy Proposal 123: Reserved Pool for Critical Infrastructure
>>>> 
>>>> Policy term: 36 Months from Implementation
>>> 
>>> Nitpick: For 36 months following implementation.
>>> 
>>> The other way could be misunderstood to mean "starts 36 months later."
>> 
>> Ok.
>> 
>>>> Upon receipt of the last /8 that the IANA will allocate to ARIN per the
>>>> Global Policy for the Allocation of the Remaining IPv4 Address Space,
>>>> ARIN will place a contiguous /16 in reserve for Critical Infrastructure.
>>>> If at the end of the policy term there is unused address space remaining
>>>> in this pool, ARIN staff is authorized to utilize this space in a manner
>>>> consistent with community expectations.
>>> 
>>> I'm not sure its necessary to have a contiguous reserve, but I SUPPORT
>>> the policy proposal as written anyway.
>> 
>> 
>> I thought about this and then saw Leo's post. Removing the word contiguous
>> should be good enough.
>> 
>> I can't think of any other requirements with respect to CI and leaving this
>> fairly open will leave the staff a healthy amount of discretion.
>> 
>> Anything else need to be done with this? Any disagreement with respect to
>> this being pushed forward as an emergency proposal?
>> 
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> -M<
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.