George, Wes E IV [NTK]
Wesley.E.George at sprint.com
Tue Nov 9 09:55:25 EST 2010
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 10:43 PM
To: Heather Schiller; Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Comcast
I don't understand these attempt to discourage discussion. Since
policy guides allocations and we can only assess policy through its
impact on allocations why would anyone say that the implications of specific
large-scale allocations cannot be discussed?
If you think specific comments are conjectural, wrong or FUD make
your case. But don't try to exempt ARIN from an open discussion of
what it does.
No one is trying to exempt ARIN from anything. There is a list for
[off-topic] discussion. It's conveniently labeled arin-discuss for a reason.
Please use it for its intended purpose.
PPML is for discussing draft and potential policies, and as far as I can
tell, none of the discussion and conjecture around what ARIN and Comcast
have done or not done has been tied even tenuously to any current or
proposed policy currently up for discussion. If I'm wrong, let's bring the
discussion back to that instead of acting like we're trying to censor
discussion when someone points out that this is off-topic.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6793 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ARIN-PPML