[arin-ppml] Reclaiming unused IPv4 space (WAS: Draft Policy 2010-10 (Global Proposal):GlobalPolicy for IPv4 Allocations by the IANA Post Exhaustion- Last Call (textrevised))
Chris Grundemann
cgrundemann at gmail.com
Wed Nov 3 13:16:43 EDT 2010
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:02, Leo Bicknell <bicknell at ufp.org> wrote:
<snip>
> The issue at hand is largely only in the domain of legacy space.
> There is no yearly fee, and thus no mechanism by which ARIN can
> determine that a resource is no longer in use.
Section 3.6 of the NRPM (the result of dp 2008-7), was meant to help
resolve this problem by requiring POCs to respond to an annual "ping."
> In terms of IPv4 runout, I don't believe this is a very interesting
> issue. What you have is a lot of /24, err "Class C's" when they
> were given out, that were handed to individuals and small businesses
> when they were free for the asking and somewhere along the line the
> company went under, the individual dropped out of the industry, or
> whatnot. We don't have a problem with "forgotten" /8's.
I suspect class Cs and especially Bs may be worth more than we might
now guess, shortly.
> However, in terms of spammers having space to hijack, and the general
> concept of Stweardship I think this is a significant problem and
> needs to be addressed. I've long been a proponent that legacy
> holders need to be brought into the fold for this and other reasons.
Hear, here.
> IMHO the minimum that ARIN should do is have yearly contact with
> anyone holding a number resource, including legacy holders. I don't
> know what the cost is to send a letter, get back a respose and check
> off "yes that person still exists", but I can't imagine it is a
> lot. I would be very supportive of a policy that caused ARIN to
> charge a fee to legacy holders of $5, or $10 or whatever that cost
> is per year to "keep their database entry current" so the community
> can detect situations like this one.
Wouldn't that require them to sign something (like an LRSA)?
~Chris
>
> --
> Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
> PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
--
@ChrisGrundemann
weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
www.burningwiththebush.com
www.coisoc.org
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list