[arin-ppml] Encouraging public participation in the PDP

[Bill Darte]

William, (as different from me)

Your earlier emails talked about broader participation.  I thought you meant more than those that currently review policy proposal.
Everything below talks to the process of evaluating, not a broader group of eyes.

bd


Bill,

Conceptually the answer seems obvious enough: when all the informative
efforts finally convince someone to step up and attempt to
participate, DON'T SHUT THEM DOWN.

As a member of the AC, some specific things you can personally do
towards that end include:

1. Remove evaluation of a policy's worth from the decision to accept a
proposal as a draft policy. Focus on whether the proposal describes
"actionable" policy, not whether the action is a good one. Focus on
helping the author revise it into actionable policy if it isn't
already and then accept it as a draft policy. After accepting it as a
draft, try to help the author revise it into the closest thing to
passable policy possible while still preserving the proposal's intent.

Let the wide community evaluate the proposal's worth. The AC can add
it's two cents when and if the draft garners the consensus to move to
last call.

Members of the AC can add their two cents any time. But hold the group
recommendation until after the whole community has spoken.


2. Let the proposal's author (or authors if proposals get merged)
guide the AC's changes, at least to the extent of not making changes
where the author advises that, "No, that goes against what the
proposal is trying to accomplish." The PDP gives the AC the authority
to revise draft policy. It doesn't tell you how you have to use that
authority. You have the leeway to use it in a way that includes the
author instead of excluding him.

Of course, you actually have to accept the proposal as a draft policy
first. This idea of "we reject you but please try again" is
exclusionary BS and there's no amount of informative outreach that's
going to make it anything other than BS. If you want to "soften" a
rejection, don't issue it in the first place.

One of the architects of Ultima Online famously said, "We want to
minimize the down side of being dead." What a stupid idea! You only
need to minimize the down side of being dead if you've unbalanced the
game against the players.


3. Delay proposing policy. Post a PPML message saying, "We're thinking
about policy which does X. What do y'all think? Would anyone like to
take a stab at policy text?" and then wait until any discussion dies
out without anyone else proposing a policy before an AC member does.

I hate the idea of #3. In the IRPEP model it wasn't necessary and
surely AC members are well qualified to write good policy proposals.
But in the PDP's structure, when an AC member jumps on top of a new
policy idea, it tends to drive the public out of the formative process
right away, reducing them to mere commenters on the AC's policy
instead of partners in the policy's creation.

ICANN has public comment. Even the FCC has public comment on its
rulemaking. Do those organizations have any meaningful public
participation in their rulemaking? Hell no. Do you really want ARIN to
become the IP address version of the FCC?


Fundamentally, though, this is a process problem. The PDP enables and
encourages a decision making process that solicits public comment but
doesn't really solicit public participation, especially for the AC
members whose natural tendency is to work behind the scenes. Unlike
the IRPEP, which had some annoying surface problems, I think the PDP
is broken at the core.

Regards,
Bill Herrin

-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20100528/84baae80/attachment.htm>