[arin-ppml] ARIN Advisory Council Thoughts about IPv4 Policies

[Leo Bicknell]

In a message written on Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:51:54AM -0400, Sweeting, John wrote:
> With that in mind, the AC would like to advise the community that
> unless a proposal affecting IPv4 assignments has a compelling benefit
> for and receives strong initial support from the community the AC
> will most likely choose to abandon the proposal.

This sounds to me, more or less, like the criteria the AC has always
used to evaluate new policy proposals.

My interpretation is that there has been some attempt to raise the
bar on new IPv4 assginment proposals, but I really don't understand
how much the bar has been rasied from this e-mail.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20100512/a5976d8d/attachment.sig>