[arin-ppml] ULA-C

Steve Bertrand steve at ibctech.ca
Tue Mar 30 23:20:38 EDT 2010

On 2010.03.30 12:06, Owen DeLong wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2010, at 7:50 AM, Scott Leibrand wrote:
>> Tony,
>> The draft looks good to me.  There is one item that I think might not have consensus here on PPML at least:
>>>   The allocation and registration authority ...
>>>    must include the ability to make an allocation on a permanent basis,
>>>    without any need for renewal.
>> I'd like to hear feedback from other folks on the tradeoff between permanent allocations vs. requiring renewal to maintain whois database consistency...
> Permanent bad.  Renewal good.

I support.

Not much thought has to go into Owen's comment to know that it is in the
best interest of everyone, especially for the long term.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list