steve at ibctech.ca
Tue Mar 30 23:20:38 EDT 2010
On 2010.03.30 12:06, Owen DeLong wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2010, at 7:50 AM, Scott Leibrand wrote:
>> The draft looks good to me. There is one item that I think might not have consensus here on PPML at least:
>>> The allocation and registration authority ...
>>> must include the ability to make an allocation on a permanent basis,
>>> without any need for renewal.
>> I'd like to hear feedback from other folks on the tradeoff between permanent allocations vs. requiring renewal to maintain whois database consistency...
> Permanent bad. Renewal good.
Not much thought has to go into Owen's comment to know that it is in the
best interest of everyone, especially for the long term.
More information about the ARIN-PPML