marla.azinger at frontiercorp.com
Tue Mar 30 12:51:38 EDT 2010
Correct me if Im wrong Tony but what I recall is this being presented in IPv6 Ops at the IETF 72 in 2008 and it was not accepted into the working group at that time and since then its sat inactive.
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Scott Leibrand
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:50 AM
To: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ULA-C
The draft looks good to me. There is one item that I think might not have consensus here on PPML at least:
> The allocation and registration authority ...
> must include the ability to make an allocation on a permanent basis,
> without any need for renewal.
I'd like to hear feedback from other folks on the tradeoff between permanent allocations vs. requiring renewal to maintain whois database consistency...
I also noticed you have two IANA Considerations sections (5 and 7).
With regards to the IETF process for this draft: is this draft a WG work item yet? Which WG(s) and list(s) will it be discussed on?
On Thu 3/25/2010 5:00 PM, Tony Hain wrote:
> FYI ---
> I will be updating
> in the next few weeks. Comments welcome.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN
> Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML