[arin-ppml] ULA-C

Scott Leibrand scottleibrand at gmail.com
Tue Mar 30 10:50:15 EDT 2010


The draft looks good to me.  There is one item that I think might not 
have consensus here on PPML at least:

>    The allocation and registration authority ...
>     must include the ability to make an allocation on a permanent basis,
>     without any need for renewal.

I'd like to hear feedback from other folks on the tradeoff between 
permanent allocations vs. requiring renewal to maintain whois database 

I also noticed you have two IANA Considerations sections (5 and 7).

With regards to the IETF process for this draft:  is this draft a WG 
work item yet?  Which WG(s) and list(s) will it be discussed on?


On Thu 3/25/2010 5:00 PM, Tony Hain wrote:
> FYI ---
> I will be updating https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac/
> in the next few weeks. Comments welcome.
> Tony
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list