scottleibrand at gmail.com
Tue Mar 30 10:50:15 EDT 2010
The draft looks good to me. There is one item that I think might not
have consensus here on PPML at least:
> The allocation and registration authority ...
> must include the ability to make an allocation on a permanent basis,
> without any need for renewal.
I'd like to hear feedback from other folks on the tradeoff between
permanent allocations vs. requiring renewal to maintain whois database
I also noticed you have two IANA Considerations sections (5 and 7).
With regards to the IETF process for this draft: is this draft a WG
work item yet? Which WG(s) and list(s) will it be discussed on?
On Thu 3/25/2010 5:00 PM, Tony Hain wrote:
> FYI ---
> I will be updating https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hain-ipv6-ulac/
> in the next few weeks. Comments welcome.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML