[arin-ppml] IPv6 Non-connected networks

Lee Dilkie Lee at dilkie.com
Fri Mar 26 16:14:32 EDT 2010

Owen DeLong wrote:
> Those that want the destruction of NAT brought forward to IPv6 are the
> ones that would need to justify such an action. I'm arguing for the status
> quo.  NAT is implemented and deployed in IPv4 and that's fine. It's not
> there in IPv6, and, that's good too!
hear hear..

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list