[arin-ppml] IPv6 Non-connected networks
owen at delong.com
Wed Mar 24 19:15:09 EDT 2010
I am... Hence my arguments against NAT as "breaking the internet" or,
more accurately, operating on a toxic-polluter economic model of the
On Mar 24, 2010, at 3:51 PM, Lee Dilkie wrote:
> Is no one concerned that NAT breaks a lot of networking, especially
> peer-to-peer, and forces some really inefficient technologies, like
> SBC's, to exist?
> There is a lot of network media traffic (example, VoIP) that is
> unnecessarily backhauled across the internet because of NAT and in an
> NAT-less IPv6 world could use less network resources and be more reliable.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML