[arin-ppml] IPv6 Non-connected networks
owen at delong.com
Mon Mar 22 22:57:41 EDT 2010
On Mar 22, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>>>>>> "Owen" == Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> writes:
>>> This concern over theoretical situations that have occured in
>>> IPv4-land only due to significant scarcity and only reported in
>>> "heresay" (due to NDA, etc.) are preventing deployment of IPv6 by
>>> many smaller, more innovative enterprises.
> Owen> Here, I must disagree. A liberalized PI policy would serve
> Owen> those smaller more innovative enterprises at least as well as
> Owen> ULA-C, if not better. Especially if it provided for an equal
> Owen> ability to get "tainted" addresses on request.
> If "tainted" address space is $10, then great.
It won't be $10. It shouldn't be $10. It shouldn't be a whole lot more than
that. I'm thinking on the order of $50/year, tainted or otherwise.
More information about the ARIN-PPML