[arin-ppml] ULA-C and reverse DNS

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Mon Mar 22 13:39:59 EDT 2010

On Mar 22, 2010, at 7:36 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:

>>>>>> "Owen" == Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> writes:
>    Owen> I think that it makes far more sense to make a liberal GUA
>    Owen> policy that allows people to get GUA if they need it
>    Owen> regardless of whether they need it for internet or not.
> Okay, I can live with this, as long as it's a simple web form w/online
> payment and no further questions.  Something a manager of a small lab
> can get without signatures from twelve other entities in the "IT"
> management part of the enterprise.
> But:
>        a) Is the price the same as for GUA?
>        b) Is the needs-requirement the same?
> If the answer is YES, then it's not a policy. Its status quo.

The answer needs to be yes, but, I believe there need to be changes
to (a) and (b) accordingly.

> If the answer is NO, then there are those that will argue that this  
> will
> be used as a run-around "routing" policy.
But the RIRs are not supposed to set "routing" policy.  "Routing" policy
is supposed to be set by those who actually run routers.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list