[arin-ppml] ULA-C

[Chris Grundemann]

Organisations are not permanent. If the administration using the prefix goes
away then shouldn't the prefix be reclaimed? Also, isn't it at least some
what possible that the need for a prefix go away? Should that organisation
be forced to keep an uneeded prefix, especially when others likely do need
it?
~Chris

My Android sent this message - hence the top post.

On Mar 31, 2010 6:17 PM, "Fred Baker" <fred at cisco.com> wrote:

Dumb question.

The complaint with ULAs as presently formulated is that there is a non-zero
probability of them colliding.

If you give a prefix to your favorite admin and have them number their
network with it, and then re-assign the prefix to someone else, what's the
probability that you have a collision?

I think you need to accept that once put into use, a ULA will be in use by
that administration permanently. You obviously see otherwise.  Fill me in?

On Mar 30, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: > > On Mar 30, 2010, at 7:50
AM, Scott Leibrand w...
http://www.ipinc.net/IPv4.GIF

_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this
message because you are...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20100331/dfa99d13/attachment.htm>