[arin-ppml] Use of "reserved" address space.

TJ trejrco at gmail.com
Sun Jun 27 18:25:32 EDT 2010

(apologies for top-posting)

There is atleast 1 ISP planning to deploy IPv6-only devices (handsets) in
the near future, and they will rely on NAT64 for those devices to reach IPv4
destinations ... I personally suspect others will follow suit.


On Jun 27, 2010 3:06 PM, "William Herrin" <bill at herrin.us> wrote:

On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>> What isn't debatable is tha...
Not a zero sum game. The likely resources mostly aren't working on
IPv6 right now regardless.

> It seems sort of like deciding to pull the experts off the efforts to cap
> well in the Gulf ...
More like ramping up the manufacturing of oil booms independent of the
experts daily activities since the experts really aren't needed to
explain how to manufacture a plain old oil boom.

>>> Better to focus on v6 transition.
>> Myopic. Unless another credible solution presents, IPv...
I hear exactly zero chatter in the ops forums about bypassing dual
stack in favor of going direct to native v6. I know some work has been
done on nat64 but are you aware of shipping COTS products designed for
enabling large scale collections of native v6 clients to communicate
with v4 servers?

Unless something changes, the transition is to dual stack. Which
requires an IPv4 address. From somewhere.

Bill Herrin

William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us

You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing Lis...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20100627/e677a67d/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list