[arin-ppml] Use of "reserved" address space.
owen at delong.com
Sat Jun 26 01:51:34 EDT 2010
I believe that in both cases, the costs almost always exceed the cost of
On Jun 25, 2010, at 11:57 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> A year or two ago there was some discussion about "reserved" address
> space. Specifically, Class E space, but in a CIDR world one has
> to wonder why we can't use most of 0/8, 127/8, and 240/4 as regular
> unicast space. There were folks who were going off to discuss that
> at the IETF and with some vendors.
> That's potentially ~18 /8's worth of address space "left on the
> table". Early review suggested that most of this in several free
> operating systems could be enabled with simple "user interface"
> changes; that is there were some checks to make sure they weren't
> used improperly by tools that set addresses but if those were removed
> they would be forwarded and treated like unicast. That is the cost
> of implementation was low.
> I realize "everything in the middle" must be upgraded to support this,
> but considering the level of effort and cost that may go into transfers
> folks may in fact find using this space cheaper. I'm surprised there
> isn't more effort to look into this area. Is there something going on
> I'm just not seeing?
> Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
> PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML