[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 118: IPv6 Subsequent Allocation

Benson Schliesser bensons at queuefull.net
Mon Jun 21 12:11:57 EDT 2010

On 21 Jun 10, at 7:39 AM, Member Services wrote:

> Modify Subsequent allocation criteria. ADD the following
> sentence: Subsequent allocations will also be considered for
> transitional technologies that cannot be accommodated by, nor were
> accounted for, under the initial allocation.
> Justification for the subsequent subnet size will be based on the plan
> and technology provided. Justification for these allocations will be
> reviewed every 3 years and reclaimed if it is not in use. Requester will
> be exempt from returning all or a portion of the address space if they
> can show justification for need of this allocation for other existing
> IPv6 addressing requirements be it Native V6 or some other V6 network
> technology.

I support this policy.  ARIN should accommodate the need for address resources supporting v6 transition.  It would be inappropriate for ARIN to prescribe or limit the transition technologies used.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list