[arin-ppml] Petition for advancement of Policy Proposal #112 to Draft Policy status

Martin Hannigan marty at akamai.com
Thu Jun 17 12:14:51 EDT 2010

I'm not planning on supporting this petition. A /10 has already been set
aside. The author could've instead suggested that 10.4 be increased to a /8,
for example which is explicit.

Unless I'm missing something, this is overly vague and without some more
explicit use, unnecessary (IMHO) and one of the time sinks with v4 policy
that we have been discussing ways to avoid.

Best Regards,


On 6/17/10 12:02 PM, "Joe Maimon" <jmaimon at chl.com> wrote:

> All,
> Following the AC's abandonment of Policy Proposal #112, I formally
> petition to advance to draft policy status the proposal and for it to be
> discussed at an upcoming ARIN Public Policy meeting.
> Statements of support for this petition would be greatly appreciated.
> Full policy text available at
> http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2010-April/017410.html
> Thanks,
> Joe
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list