[arin-ppml] Petition for advancement of Policy Proposal #110 to Draft Policy status

[Martin Hannigan]

I'm not planning on supporting this one either.

I can appreciate the concepts of helping small organizations with v6
transition, but this is the most complex proposal that I have ever read and
it's difficult to ascertain what the author is actually trying to accomplish
for the end-game. It also has the longest rationale that I have ever read.

The composition of the AC includes smaller organizations and it was still
abandoned. I think I trust the AC on this one all considered.

Here's what happened at the relevant AC meeting:

"It was moved by OD, and seconded by RS, that:
 
 
The ARIN Advisory  Council, having reviewed the proposal entitled
ŒPreservation of Minimal IPv4  Resources for New and Small Organizations and
for IPv6 Transition¹¹, abandons  it. The Council requests that the President
advise the community of the  availability of the Petition Process."

[ discussion ] https://www.arin.net/about_us/ac/ac2010_0520.html

"The motion carried unanimously  via roll call."



Best Regards,

-M<


On 6/17/10 12:02 PM, "Joe Maimon" <jmaimon at chl.com> wrote:

> All,
> 
> Following the AC's abandonment of Policy Proposal #110, I formally
> petition to advance to draft policy status the proposal and for it to be
> discussed at an upcoming ARIN Public Policy meeting.
> 
> Statements of support for this petition would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Full policy text available at
> 
> http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2010-April/017321.html
> 
> Thanks,
> Joe
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.