[arin-ppml] Possible amendment to proposal 116
bill at herrin.us
Mon Jul 26 12:44:37 EDT 2010
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:47 AM, <michael.dillon at bt.com> wrote:
> We have a glut of IPv6 addresses. If the transition addresses are mismanaged
> and it takes us 5 years of discussion and overthrow of the BoT in order
> to get the addresses back, this is still a drop in the bucket and will
> not affect regular IPv6 allocation activity.
> We just have to get out of this darn scarcity mindset, in particular when
> it comes to helping the world get through this awkward transitionary period.
116 has to do with allocating from a set-aside block of scarce IPv4
addresses for projects that facilitate the transition to IPv6. It does
not address the allocation or assignment of IPv6 addresses at all.
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
More information about the ARIN-PPML