[arin-ppml] How bad is it really?

Steve Bertrand steve at ipv6canada.com
Mon Jul 12 21:46:20 EDT 2010

On 2010.07.12 18:02, John Curran wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>> Keep in mind that Section 3.6.1 requires ARIN to publish a list of
>> invalid POCS, so we should have in a year or two a list of subnets
>> that are "ripe for mining" as they say.  
> Ted is right on target here, and we're proceeding with POC 
> validation at an aggressive rate.  (For more information, see 
> <https://www.arin.net/resources/services/poc_validation.html>)
> We're presently sending out 7500 validation requests each week,
> and getting just over a 33% update rate on those requests. It's
> too early to draw conclusions, but there's obviously ample space
> which presently lacks a responsive contact.  We'll provide a more
> detailed update on POC validation during the October PPML meeting.

Cheers for having a relatively accurate % so quickly in the discussion.

That is admirable.


ps. I'm a small part of that 33%. all it took was one ``click'' ;)

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list