[arin-ppml] How bad is it really?

John Curran jcurran at arin.net
Mon Jul 12 18:02:14 EDT 2010

On Jul 12, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:

> Keep in mind that Section 3.6.1 requires ARIN to publish a list of
> invalid POCS, so we should have in a year or two a list of subnets
> that are "ripe for mining" as they say.  

Ted is right on target here, and we're proceeding with POC 
validation at an aggressive rate.  (For more information, see 

We're presently sending out 7500 validation requests each week,
and getting just over a 33% update rate on those requests. It's
too early to draw conclusions, but there's obviously ample space
which presently lacks a responsive contact.  We'll provide a more
detailed update on POC validation during the October PPML meeting.


John Curran
President and CEO

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list