[arin-ppml] Ending point to point links as a justification fora /30?

Davis, Terry L terry.l.davis at boeing.com
Fri Jul 30 10:14:02 EDT 2010


Michael/Joe

I agree also; confrontational approaches will most likely fail.

I more suggest that ARIN find every way possible to incentivize use and migration to IPv6!

As we approach the end of IPv4 space, should an IPv4 allocation also require a corresponding IPv6 request and/or an IPv6 migration plan?

Take care
Terry
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net 
> [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of michael.dillon at bt.com
> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 6:46 AM
> To: arin-ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Ending point to point links as a 
> justification fora /30?
> 
> > I am opposed to reclamation techniques that step up the 
> confrontational
> > and adversarial relationship between ARIN and address holders, even
> > were
> > it to be essential for continued consumption of IPv4 and 
> IPv6 did not
> > exist. I view increasing auditing and mandatory triggers of 
> audits with
> > similar concern.
> > 
> > Expending good will and buy in, not to mention financial 
> resources, all
> > for relatively limited return along with greater risks of legal and
> > political liabilities is not a good bargain.
> > 
> > Bad cop is not a character role an organization like ARIN 
> should choose
> > to be identified with.
> > 
> > Incentives for efficiencies, that is where my support 
> lands. Even then,
> > I prefer less direct incentives, those that can be spread 
> and carried
> > by
> > the invisible hand.
> > 
> > I would support ARIN advocacy for technical standards and 
> features that
> > were mindful of IPv4 scarcity. I would also support advocacy for
> > technical standards and features that would help smooth 
> migration and
> > transition to IPv6. I believe ARIN does have a role to play 
> there and
> > not just a passive one. Let them be a voice of the addressing
> > community,
> > a liaison, to help focus on those concerns in many an arena.
> > 
> > Joe
> 
> Well said, Joe!
> I am 100% in agreement with this approach.
> 
> --Michael Dillon
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> 


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list