[arin-ppml] How bad is it really?

[Steve Bertrand]

On 2010.07.12 22:21, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 7/12/10 6:46 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> On 2010.07.12 18:02, John Curran wrote:
>>> On Jul 12, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>>>
>>>> Keep in mind that Section 3.6.1 requires ARIN to publish a list of
>>>> invalid POCS, so we should have in a year or two a list of subnets
>>>> that are "ripe for mining" as they say.  
>>>
>>> Ted is right on target here, and we're proceeding with POC 
>>> validation at an aggressive rate.  (For more information, see 
>>> <https://www.arin.net/resources/services/poc_validation.html>)
>>>
>>> We're presently sending out 7500 validation requests each week,
>>> and getting just over a 33% update rate on those requests. It's
>>> too early to draw conclusions, but there's obviously ample space
>>> which presently lacks a responsive contact.  We'll provide a more
>>> detailed update on POC validation during the October PPML meeting.
>>
>> Cheers for having a relatively accurate % so quickly in the discussion.
>>
>> That is admirable.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> ps. I'm a small part of that 33%. all it took was one ``click'' ;)
>> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 4 clicks for me so far. ;)

...seth, why?

you're not trying to `click' on the cli again, are you? ;)

Steve