[arin-ppml] How bad is it really?

John Curran jcurran at arin.net
Mon Jul 12 18:02:14 EDT 2010


On Jul 12, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:

> Keep in mind that Section 3.6.1 requires ARIN to publish a list of
> invalid POCS, so we should have in a year or two a list of subnets
> that are "ripe for mining" as they say.  

Ted is right on target here, and we're proceeding with POC 
validation at an aggressive rate.  (For more information, see 
<https://www.arin.net/resources/services/poc_validation.html>)

We're presently sending out 7500 validation requests each week,
and getting just over a 33% update rate on those requests. It's
too early to draw conclusions, but there's obviously ample space
which presently lacks a responsive contact.  We'll provide a more
detailed update on POC validation during the October PPML meeting.

/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN




More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list