[arin-ppml] Set aside policy?

[Martin Hannigan]

I¹m aware of 4.10 and your proposal.  I¹m not thinking about NAT devices or
small numbers of hosts as transition infrastructure. I¹m interesting in
other ideas. Thanks for pointing everyone at these though.


Best,

-M<


On 7/1/10 9:27 PM, "Owen DeLong" <owen at delong.com> wrote:

> Do you mean beyond 4.10 or are you looking to change 4.10 in some way?
> 
> Have you looked at my recent proposal for additional limitations on the space
> reserved under 4.10?
> 
> Owen
> 
> For reference:
> 
> 4.10 Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6 Deployment
> When ARIN receives its last /8 IPv4 allocation from IANA, a contiguous /10
> IPv4 block will be set aside and dedicated to facilitate IPv6 deployment.
> Allocations and assignments from this block must be justified by immediate
> IPv6 deployment requirements. Examples of such needs include: IPv4 addresses
> for key dual stack DNS servers, and NAT-PT or NAT464 translators. ARIN staff
> will use their discretion when evaluating justifications.
> This block will be subject to a minimum size allocation of /28 and a maximum
> size allocation of /24. ARIN should use sparse allocation when possible within
> that /10 block.
> In order to receive an allocation or assignment under this policy:
> 1. the applicant may not have received resources under this policy in the
> preceding six months;
> 2. previous allocations/assignments under this policy must continue to meet
> the justification requirements of this policy;
> 3. previous allocations/assignments under this policy must meet the
> utilization requirements of end user assignments;
> 4. the applicant must demonstrate that no other allocations or assignments
> will meet this need;
> 5. on subsequent allocation under this policy, ARIN staff may require
> applicants to renumber out of previously allocated / assigned space under this
> policy in order to minimize non-contiguous allocations.
> 
> 
> On Jul 1, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Folks,
>> 
>> Is there _anything_ that people would consider reasonable for a set-aside
>> policy? I'm thinking about policy for transition infrastructure and wanted
>> to see if anyone else is thinking about this.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> -M<
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20100702/59422de8/attachment.htm>