[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 95: Customer Confidentiality
joe at joesdatacenter.com
Thu Jan 28 18:04:53 EST 2010
That is really not the point of this proposal. The point is that I
should not have to give up my entire customer list to my competitors.
If somebody is having problems with a company doing business under my
IP space then there is no reason why they cant contact my arin abuse
poc. I would rather those go to me than to the customer that can just
ignore it. I already have problems with people sending complaints to
the wrong places and I never even get contacted with the abuse
complaint. I don't understand as arin can request the information why
does it need to be open to the public?
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/28/2010 2:35 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>> Kevin Kargel wrote:
>>> I agree with and support the AC's decision to abandon Policy proposal 95.
>> So do I, but I would suggest that anyone opposed DO NOT respond to
>> this. All your doing is re-opening the discussion again which is,
>> of course, exactly what the submitter wants.
> I voted to abandon this proposal, but IMO it's still perfectly valid to
> discuss the issue here on PPML. Specifically, the question at hand is
> whether to make this proposal a draft policy and discuss it at the
> face-to-face public policy meeting in Toronto. The AC gave our opinion, and
> now it's up to the community to petition to advance the proposal if enough
> of you disagree with the AC on the matter.
> This is also the first use of the petition process under the new PDP, so I'm
> hoping to see the process run smoothly, whatever the outcome.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
Joe's Datacenter, LLC
More information about the ARIN-PPML